2 answers |
BigotryIs there a fallacy in where one claims that the only reason one is arguing for x is so that they can simply justify their bigotry, and therefore the claims one makes are invalid? |
3 answers |
Give an example of each type of fallacy.Give an example of each type of fallacy. In the "evidence" column include the link to the example, why you think it is this kind of fallacy, and why it is problematic. 1.Strawman 2.slippery slope 3. Special Pleading 4. The gambler's fallacy 5. ... |
3 answers |
is this an exmaple of the definist fallacy?I've seen someone on a forum define the gay as: "The attraction to a person who posses either same-sex chromosomes or same-sex secondary characteristics" Additionally, how would someone potentially argue against this if someone were to say "this is... |
3 answers |
What's wrong with this logic?Why do women overwhelmingly file for divorce? Until 1964, an employer could refuse to hire you because you're a woman. Until 1974, refusing to sell a woman a home was legal. Until the 1970s, banks could refuse a women credit cards and bank accounts ... |
1 answers |
Is this deflection?My supervisor was explaining new stocking procedures going forward to our department. He pointed out an employee in our department wasn't following protocol. I asked then why isn't he reprimanded for his actions? My supervisors response was you can'... |
3 answers |
IS THERE ANY FALLACY IN THIS DISCUSSION? OR WHATABOUTISM ONLY?We lost our vice president in a tragic plane crash with oher VIP personnel. The discussion went like this. "I cry about my vp alot, he was not supposed to die like that" &... |
3 answers |
Help explaining a logical fallacy to my friendI recently had a conversation with my friend on morality in which I asked for an example of when r*pe would be considered a "good act." The example produced went something along the lines of this. "What if a war lord was holding a bunch of people (... |
2 answers |
Is this a fallacy of definition?Transphobes consider 'cis' a slur because "There is only make and femake?" Is this appeal to what is supposedly "self-evident"? |
2 answers |
Is there something wrong with this reasoning?Premise 1: If a person does not meet a requirement for a certain word, then you ought not say it Premise 2: Person A does not meet the requirement Conclusion: Therefore, Person A ought not say the word |
2 answers |
Guilt tripAfter talking to a friend of mine about an incident at work involving me an employee in which the other coworker accused me of being racist after finding out who I voted for. I told him that hey aren't we still friends? My coworkers response...I don... |