Argument by Pigheadedness
(also known as: argument by stubbornness, invincible ignorance fallacy)
Description: This is a refusal to accept a well-proven argument for one of many reasons related to stubbornness. It can also be the refusal to argue about a claim that one supports.
Logical Form:
Argument X is well-argued.
Person 1 has no objections to the argument, besides just refusing to accept the conclusion.
Therefore, argument X is not true.
Example #1:
Dad: You are failing math since you moved the Xbox to your room. You have been playing video games for at least 6 hours each day since. Before that, you consistently got A's and B's. Don't you think that the video games are the real problem here?
Blake: No.
Explanation: Blake is offering no counter argument or reasoning for rejecting his dad's well-articulated argument. He is simply being stubborn.
Example #2:
Cathy: I hate everything about Michelle Obama!
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Let's Move!," to reduce childhood obesity?
Cathy: Yes.
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national veterans' campaign, "Joining Forces," with Dr. Jill Biden?
Cathy: Yes.
Jorge: Do you hate that she traveled to Africa for a week to focus on youth leadership, education, health, and wellness?
Cathy: Yes.
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Reach Higher," a higher education initiative?
Cathy: Yes.
Jorge: Do you hate that she launched the national campaign, "Let Girls Learn," a global focus on girls' education?
Cathy: Yes.
Jorge: Do you hate her well-toned triceps and biceps?
Cathy: Yes, especially those!
Explanation: Unreasonable people tend to engage in black-and-white thinking and are committed to an ideological position at any expense—including reason. Cathy is one of those people.
Exception: Don’t confuse unwillingness to engage with the argument by pigheadedness.
Street Preacher (to a woman walking by wearing a t-shirt that reads “Thank God I am an atheist!”): You are going to burn in hell!
Woman: (keeps walking)
Street Preacher: (frantically quoting Bible verses that support his claim).
Woman: Yeah, I don’t think so.
Street Preacher: (Yelling Bible verses louder as the woman gets farther away, while trying to keep up with her).
Woman: I don’t buy it, sorry! By the way, you just stepped in dog poop.
In this example, the woman is not sincerely engaging in the argument. She might have no interest, no time, or simply sees using the Bible to support claims in the Bible as circular reasoning, and not see the street preacher as a worthy interlocutor.
Tip: As a reminder, avoid absolutes. Instead of saying that you "hate everything" about someone, say something such as, "there's not much I like about..."
References:
This a logical fallacy frequently used on the Internet. No academic sources could be found.
Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!
Reason: Books I & II
This book is based on the first five years of The Dr. Bo Show, where Bo takes a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter with the goal of educating and entertaining. Every chapter in the book explores a different aspect of reason by using a real-world issue or example.
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
