Life

Why bother taking care of yourself, eating right, and exercising? Your just wasting what time you have, we’re all going to die anyway. Hell you could get hit by a bus tomorrow so what does it matter? 

What fallacious reasoning is being used here? 

The reasoning presented in your query contains several logical fallacies and instances of poor reasoning. Here are a few that stand out:

1. **Nihilistic Fallacy**: The argument suggests that because life ultimately ends in death, any efforts to prolong life or improve its quality are meaningless. This fallacy ignores the intrinsic and extrinsic benefits of a healthier lifestyle, such as improved quality of life, reduced suffering, and increased productivity.

2. **False Dichotomy**: By stating that one might get hit by a bus tomorrow, it presents a false dichotomy—either one gets hit by a bus and dies suddenly, or one does not need to care for oneself because death is inevitable. This reasoning overlooks the vast middle ground where most people live long lives and can significantly benefit from good health practices.

3. **Appeal to Futility**: This fallacy argues that because the ultimate outcome (death) is unavoidable, any effort to impact the journey (health, well-being) is futile. It ignores the complexities and subtleties of life, where small efforts can lead to significant improvements and a more fulfilling existence.

4. **Short-Termism**: The argument focuses narrowly on an immediate worst-case scenario ("you could get hit by a bus tomorrow"), which is a cognitive bias known as short-termism. This bias ignores the long-term benefits and probabilities of leading a healthier life.

5. **Neglect of Probability**: The reasoning disproportionately emphasizes an unlikely event (getting hit by a bus) over more probable outcomes (living to an old age, experiencing chronic diseases). This skews the rationale for personal health and well-being.

6. **False Analogy**: Comparing the act of caring for oneself to something as uncontrollably random as getting hit by a bus is a misleading analogy. Taking care of oneself is a controlled and proactive choice, while getting hit by a bus is largely outside personal control and much rarer.

Understanding and addressing these logical fallacies and biases can help create a stronger, more reasonable argument for the value of taking care of oneself. While the certainty of death is inevitable, the manner and quality of the journey towards it are highly influenced by personal choices related to health and well-being.