Question

...
Sing

Fault Finding

I guess that fault finding should be a kind of fallacy.  It goes like this.

Tom goes out side.

Mom: It is a bad decision, because you may get Covid-19.

Tom stays home.

Mom: it is a bad decision, because you should have some fresh air.

It's always wrong no matter what Tom does.

Is that correct that it's a fallacy? What is its name? How to handle it?

Thanks a lot.

asked on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 12:55:00 PM by Sing

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book. 

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
4

This sounds like Double Bind. Not really a fallacy.
answered on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 01:15:11 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
1
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:

Could it be classified, in the context of an argument, as a rhetoric technique?

I remember watching an example from a YouTube video, and it goes as follows:

Person 1: *talking*

Person 2:  *tries to interrupt*

Person 1:  Do you plan to let me finish, or keep butting in?

Now person 2 is "bound", as the video put it. Either they let person 1 finish or they keep yapping about something else. Either way, they've done what person 1 suggested they do.

I'm not 100% convinced by this example, but...

posted on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 02:16:22 PM
...
2
Bo Bennett, PhD writes:
[To Rationalissimus of the Elenchus]

Sure. Similar to gaslighting .

[ login to reply ] posted on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 02:34:41 PM
...
0
Sing writes:

Thank you so much. Your comments are very helpful.

posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 11:06:50 PM
...
Arlo
1

I don't see a logical fallacy at all, except perhaps cherry picking by choosing alternate reasons for supporting opposing positions.

I'm not sure Mom's logic is bad – it seems that she's more inclined to find fault than be supportive.  (I suspect Mom isn't the only one highly skilled in seeing the down side of things.)

Mom correctly identifies at least one risk associated with each option and then stops short of actually assessing and comparing those risks (catching COVID from being out in public vs. being unhealthy from lacking fresh air).  She does have a point in each situation; however, just because there's some degree of risk associated with a particular option doesn't mean that risk is too great to accept.

I might be able to criticize Mom for a number of things ... just not for bad logic.
answered on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 10:18:25 AM by Arlo

Arlo Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
0
Sing writes:

Thank you very much. This is very helpful.  

posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 11:11:48 PM
...
Dr. Richard
1

This is a Linguistic Presupposition, like when did you stop beating your wife? When faced with such a situation, I found that giving the person an all-knowing smile, and saying: “Why do you think I used to beat my wife?”

This puts the onus, the burden of proof, back on the one who made the pronouncement. 

answered on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 07:45:55 AM by Dr. Richard

Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
0
Sing writes:

Thank you very much. I can see how to handle it.

posted on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 11:08:49 PM