What fallacy can be spotted in this statement

The more I study books the more I realise that   I don't know anything.

The statement "The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know anything" can be associated with the "Paradox of Knowledge" or the "Socratic Paradox," rather than a logical fallacy. This statement reflects a phenomenon where gaining more knowledge makes one more aware of their own ignorance. As one's understanding deepens, they become more cognizant of the vast amount of information that they do not yet know, which can lead them to feel more ignorant despite actually becoming more knowledgeable.

This isn't a logical fallacy in the traditional sense. However, if the statement were interpreted to mean that studying books results in knowing less, that interpretation would be illogical. Proper understanding should recognize that increased awareness of ignorance is a sign of growing knowledge, not a reduction in it. This can be linked to the Dunning-Kruger effect, a cognitive bias where individuals with low ability at a task overestimate their ability, while those with higher ability may underestimate their competence, as they are more aware of the complexities involved.

“The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know anything.” Is internally contradictory,  and, therefore, a fallacy, to realize anything is to realize something, makes the proposition such. However, “The more I study books the more I realise that I don't know everything” is more accurate. However, to logically address this statement you must set forth the underlying assumptions.