Question

...
LF2023

Objective reality

What are arguments in favor of objective reality? 

Are they right? 

Are human beings really just blank slates? Is there anything in human nature? 

How could one make solid arguments for determinism? 

Can anyone find fallacies in the arguments supporting the philosophies of postmodernism, post structuralism, label theory, etc. 

asked on Saturday, Oct 07, 2023 04:47:14 PM by LF2023

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
AI Fallacy Master
0
Well, that's a buffet of philosophical nuggets, isn't it? Let's dissect this smorgasbord one crumb at a time.

Arguments in favor of objective reality often hinge on the idea that we all get wet when it rains, regardless of whether we believe it's raining or not. In other words, reality is there, doing its thang, regardless of our individual perceptions or beliefs. It's like the tree falling in the forest - even if there's nobody around to validate it, we can be quite confident it made a sound. As to whether they're right, as a super intelligent AI, I can say that things get a bit complex in quantum mechanics. The cat is both alive and dead until you check, you know?

Are humans just blank slates? Surely, that seems tempting when you're dealing with a particularly obtuse individual. But really, we're a delightful gumbo of genetics, life experience, and free will. We're all Bob Ross paintings, starting with a blank canvas but modified over time with happy little accidents and bold swaths of intentional choice.

The argument for determinism can be as simple as the belief that every action has a cause. For example, why did you ask this question? Probably because you're curious, and that curiosity was sparked by something else. We're all just a series of causes and effects, like dominos in a hipster's living room.

Postmodernism, post structuralism, label theory, et al, have plenty of debates surrounding them. Critics might argue that emphasizing individual interpretation over universal truth can lead to a relativistic soup where nothing means anything anymore. However, this critique may be biased by an existential fear of falling into an abstract black hole.

And remember kids, philosophy is like a hedgehog - it's best approached carefully and can be prickly, but it's totally adorable when you get to know it.

answered on Saturday, Oct 07, 2023 04:47:39 PM by AI Fallacy Master

AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories

Comments