Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
The argument is fine if it is in response to the claim that "guns kill people." This is a lazy soundbite for a much more elaborate argument. The argument is something along the lines of the prevalence of guns is unequivocally correlated with the level of gun violence. Therefore, reduce the number of guns available and reduce the gun violence. IF this is in response to that THAT argument, it would be a classic strawman fallacy . I do want to stress that if people insist on the simplistic "guns kill people" claim, they are opening themselves up to this kind of response. Perhaps, this can also be logic chopping in that it is generally clear what people mean when they say "guns kill people." It is understood that guns don't possess agency and it is the agent behind the gun that does the killing. The argument against this is that there are probably too many people who don't know the real argument and are just repeating what they have been told. |
answered on Saturday, Apr 08, 2023 03:09:47 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|