Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
The age of the trees themselves would just be incorrect information. Another poster had mentioned that it would be a non sequitur , but that is in fact a fallacy. The age of a country compared to a particular set of trees doesn't really have any bearing on the effectiveness of its foreign policy. It is possible that this person was speaking figuratively - not literally saying that the age of the trees matter, but that Iran being a much older country gives some increased veracity to their claims. I might call that an argument from age . |
answered on Tuesday, Jun 27, 2023 03:59:29 PM by FormerRedditor | |
FormerRedditor Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
In addition to the other comments, almost all murderers use toothpaste. |
answered on Wednesday, Jun 28, 2023 11:39:55 AM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|