Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
I've read about defeasible and indefeasible evidence in an intro to philosophy book a while back. The whole business is to give an account of justification to the justification condition of knowledge. Indefeasible evidence is the kind of evidence that you cannot doubt. Defeasible evidence is the kind of evidence that may be "defeated" by other evidence. I think that an unfalsifiable argument has more to do with an error in thinking while the notion of defeasibility is more of a tool in philosophy. |
answered on Tuesday, Nov 08, 2022 03:04:04 PM by Jorge | |
Jorge Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|