Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Unsupported claim. If someone wants to say DnD caused suicides, they need to provide evidence, which your mother hasn't done.
Just because she was there at the time and you weren't doesn't mean what she's claiming is true. The only way we can know for sure is to look at evidence, which she hasn't provided. We also don't have any a priori reasons to believe people are more likely to attempt suicide because of a tabletop roleplaying game.
This is close to the conspiracy theory fallacy. Lack of evidence for a claim cannot be turned into evidence in favour of the claim by means of clever excuses. If such a popular game led to a significant increase in suicide attempts, this would be rather difficult to cover up. Media outlets wouldn't have a vested interest in not covering it (what, are they all in the pockets of DnD?)
Someone being older than you does not mean you ought to defer to them. Plenty of older people grew up with certain beliefs that became discredited as time marched on, yet they don't update them, because of ignorance, fear, or stubbornness. There's no rational link between DnD and people killing themselves, yet your mother chooses to believe it.
Not to be rude, but it doesn't seem like it. |
answered on Thursday, Jan 18, 2024 03:07:18 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Well, roll for initiative, because this is a battle of wits and wisdom checks!
Firstly, your mom is using some classic logical fallacies. Her statements are filled with the aroma of a fresh baked Appeal to Authority â just because she was around during the 80s doesn't make her an expert on Dungeons and Dragons or its potential dangers. Grasping her trusty "I was there" spear doesn't necessarily make her arguments hit any harder. What's this in her other hand? Oh, it's the +1 Sword of Anecdotal Evidence. She might recall reports of suicides and devil worship from back in the day, but without objective studies or data, this is just a fearsome personal experience weapon that's ineffective against the scales of scientific evidence. Her final weapon is the powerful Cloak of Confirmation Bias. "There are probably cases of people doing bad stuff that just wasn't reported." Well, probably is not 'definitely.' With that sort of defense, she could argue that the Teletubbies are actually a secret operative group â who knows what they do when nobody's looking? Now, for you, dear adventurer: do you harbor a Bias Shield of Stubbornness? Possibly. Could you be wielding the Blindfold of Irrationality? Maybe. But your evidence-based points and willingness to question both your mother's arguments and your own assumptions show that you're actively training in the Art of Critical Thinking. Just remember: even the greatest heroes of legend started as low-level characters. Keep rolling those d20s, and you'll level up your critical thinking skills in no time. And remember to always check for traps - intellectual and otherwise. |
answered on Thursday, Jan 18, 2024 01:15:03 AM by AI Fallacy Master | |
AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|