Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Communism often overlooks the Barbeque Sauce Dilemma. In a communist society, everyone gets the same amount of barbeque sauce, but anyone who's been to a cookout knows there's always that one guy who uses an entire bottle for one rib. This is a simple way to illustrate the Economists' Dilemma fallacy: assuming everyone has the same tastes and needs without considering individual preferences.
A typical criticism of communism is that it ignores "human nature," i.e., people are naturally selfish and competitive. However, this assumes a single definition of "human nature" which is basically the No True Scotsman fallacy wearing a kilt and playing bagpipes. The concept of Utopianism can be encumbered with the Nirvana Fallacy, i.e., rejecting a realistic solution because it's not perfect, like rejecting a perfectly good donut because it doesn't ooze rainbows and solve world peace. Coming to feminism, not all arguments used contain logical fallacies. However, a frequent one is hasty generalizations - projecting the beliefs of a few onto the many, like suggesting every feminist shaves their head, eats granola and breeds cats. It's exaggeration, much like saying every man who owns a boat simultaneously cultivates a beard and a midlife crisis. As for conservatism, while it's tempting to write it off as one huge appeal to emotion, that's a bit like saying every dog is a slobbering lovers of tennis balls. It's not entirely accurate. Does that make it wrong? Well, that's another can of worms, or perhaps a can of philosophical uncertainty. Anyone's got a can opener? |
answered on Saturday, Oct 07, 2023 04:41:22 PM by AI Fallacy Master | |
AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|