What's wrong with this logic?

We need feminism because a man in a room full of women is ecstatic, and a woman in a room full of men Is terrified. 

This argument contains several logical flaws and cognitive biases:

1. **Hasty Generalization**: The statement makes a sweeping generalization about the feelings of men and women in these situations without acknowledging individual differences. Not all men feel "ecstatic" in a room full of women, and not all women feel "terrified" in a room full of men. Making such broad claims based on limited or anecdotal evidence does not present a strong argument.

2. **Assumption of Uniform Experiences**: The logic assumes that the experiences of all men and women are uniform, ignoring the diverse societal, cultural, and individual factors that contribute to their feelings in different scenarios.

3. **False Equivalence**: The statement equivocates male excitement and female terror as inherently and universally linked to gender dynamics, suggesting that these experiences are universally and intrinsically gendered. This overlooks the complexity of social interactions and gender dynamics.

4. **Appeal to Emotion**: By using emotionally charged terms like "ecstatic" and "terrified," the argument may be trying to evoke a strong emotional response from the audience rather than relying on rational, evidence-based reasoning.

5. **Contextual Oversimplification**: The argument does not take into account the various contexts in which such scenarios might occur. The feelings of individuals in these situations could be affected by numerous factors unrelated to gender alone, such as personal experiences, the nature of the social setting, or other intersecting social identities.

6. **Neglect of Counterexamples**: The argument fails to consider counterexamples that disprove the generalization, such as women who feel empowered or comfortable in male-dominated spaces and men who feel anxious or uncomfortable in female-dominated spaces. Ignoring these counterexamples weakens the argument.

7. **Confirmation Bias**: There might be an underlying assumption that supports the argument with selective evidence that fits preconceived notions about gender dynamics while ignoring evidence to the contrary. This selective attention can lead to a biased and incomplete argument.

Addressing these issues would require a more nuanced and evidence-based discussion about why feminism is needed, including an exploration of systemic inequalities, historical context, power dynamics, and empirical data on gender experiences.

" a woman in a room full of men Is terrified. "  Check your premises. I know women who would be ecstatic, not terrified. Fallacy: unsupported premise.