Shotgun fallacy

I have often gotten a response to an argument that does not directly address the core issue but, instead returns a number of other questions as if they were on topic. I have called this the "shotgun fallacy" in my mind but is there a more common name for this?

What you've described as the "shotgun fallacy" is commonly known as the **Gish Gallop**. The Gish Gallop is a debate tactic in which one party overwhelms their opponent with a rapid series of many small arguments, none of which are necessarily sound or logically cohesive. This method relies on the difficulty the opponent faces in adequately addressing each point within the constraints of the debate format or time limits, thus making it appear as though the Gish Galloper's position is stronger or more robust than it actually is.

### Key Points of the Gish Gallop:

1. **Volume Over Substance**: It inundates the discourse with numerous points, making it impractical to respond to each one thoroughly.
2. **Superficial Arguments**: Often, the arguments themselves may be weak or irrelevant, but the sheer number makes it hard to refute them all promptly.
3. **Misleading Impression**: This tactic can create an illusion of credibility or thoroughness because it appears that the Gish Galloper has an abundance of evidence and counterarguments.

The term "Gish Gallop" is named after creationist Duane Gish, who was known for using this technique in debates about evolution.

### How to Counter a Gish Gallop:

1. **Focus on Key Points**: Identify and address the core arguments that are central to the debate rather than trying to refute every single point.
2. **Highlight the Fallacy**: Explicitly call out the Gish Gallop tactic, explaining to the audience that the overwhelming number of points is a strategy to evade in-depth discussion and scrutiny.
3. **Demand Specificity**: Ask for a more detailed and specific argument on individual points to bring the discussion back to a more manageable scope.

By recognizing and addressing the Gish Gallop, you can steer the discourse back towards a more logical and focused examination of the core issues.

In addition to the comments by AI Fallacy Master, I found I can stop the barrage using Peter Boghossian’s technique to communicate effectively with people who hold radically different beliefs. Boghossian, Peter; Lindsay, James. How to Have Impossible Conversations: A Very Practical Guide. Hachette Books. Kindle Edition.