Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
I think the fallacy that best describes the situation as a whole is retrogressive causation . The tire salesman, in an effort to get you to have better tires, goes about it by destroying your tires. But, in the end section of the scenario, where the tire salesman uses the excuse of "but your tires don't work" to deflect from the fact that he was the one who destroyed them, that would be an example of rationalization . |
answered on Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 02:08:51 PM by Mr. Wednesday | |
Mr. Wednesday Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
There's no fallacy here. This is extortion. |
||||||||||||||
answered on Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 11:50:35 AM by Mchasewalker | |||||||||||||||
Mchasewalker Suggested These Categories |
|||||||||||||||
Comments |
|||||||||||||||
|