Question

...

What type of fallacy is this?

Every man is mortal. Your mom is mortal. Your mom is a man.

asked on Wednesday, Aug 04, 2021 10:25:35 PM by

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
4

fallacy of (the) undistributed middle.

A formal fallacy in a categorical syllogism where the middle term (mortal), or the term that does not appear in the conclusion, is not distributed to the other two terms. For a good explanation of what it means to be distributed, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_proposition#Distributivity

 

 
answered on Thursday, Aug 05, 2021 07:54:44 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
0
account no longer exists writes:

Fallacy: affirming the consequent, perhaps?

posted on Wednesday, Aug 18, 2021 06:38:32 PM
...
0
Bo Bennett, PhD writes:
[To Prof M]

I didn't see how that fit the logical form. But sometimes we can adjust the language a bit without changing the form. If you can see how this works, let me know.

[ login to reply ] posted on Thursday, Aug 19, 2021 07:05:08 AM
...
richard smith
0

The term "man" is being used as a general term and not specific. Maybe Equivocation.

answered on Thursday, Aug 05, 2021 09:18:53 AM by richard smith

richard smith Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
2
Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

Good point... "Man" can be used here as "humanity" in premise 1 and "a man" in the conclusion.

posted on Thursday, Aug 05, 2021 10:54:13 AM
...
1
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:
[To Bo Bennett, PhD]

The use of "a man" rather than "man" appears to negate this possibility, but there's still a chance that linguistic confusion is at play here.

[ login to reply ] posted on Thursday, Aug 05, 2021 05:35:31 PM