Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
While this is certainly a thing that happens, fallacy isn't the right word for it. A fallacy specifically refers to an error in logic where a conclusion cannot be drawn from an argument. Misinformation, cognitive biases, and misleading rhetoric are a few examples of things that would cause someone to believe something is false, but doesn't necessarily contain any logical errors. I can't think of any specific term for what your describing, but when you're talking about a large population believing a thing that is demonstrably false, mass delusion is a commonly used term. I think cognitive bias generally describes the vulnerability of humans to be deceived. |
|||
answered on Thursday, Jan 25, 2024 05:54:17 PM by Mr. Wednesday | ||||
Mr. Wednesday Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|