What's wrong with this logic?

Years ago at my old job, I was sexually harassed by a female employee that I wasn't romantically interested in. There was a witness to these incidents of harassment. I reported it and she was fired. After this ordeal, coworkers talked amongst each other saying things like "we better not tell a dirty joke around Kris", he might report us for sexual harassment. I was even asked by another female associate " I bet if she was attractive, you wouldn't have filed for harassment. This is one of the main reasons why I'm reluctant to report any future harassment, insults, ethical misconduct to HR anywhere I work. 

The reasoning in this scenario contains several issues related to logical fallacies and cognitive biases:

1. **Hasty Generalization**: The conclusion that the person is reluctant to report any future harassment or misconduct is based on a specific past experience. One negative experience does not necessarily predict the outcome of similar actions in the future, especially in different environments or with different individuals.

2. **Slippery Slope**: The assumption that reporting harassment once will always lead to the same negative social repercussions is a slippery slope fallacy. The individual's past experience with coworkers reacting negatively does not guarantee that all future reports will result in similar outcomes.

3. **Ad Hominem**: The comment made by the female associate, "I bet if she was attractive, you wouldn't have filed for harassment," is an ad hominem attack. It dismisses the validity of the reporting by attacking the individual's motives rather than addressing the behavior of the harasser. This diverts the conversation from the actual issue of harassment to the personal preferences of the victim.

4. **Social Proof Bias**: The decision to not report future incidents might be influenced by the reactions and attitudes of coworkers rather than the actual importance and correctness of reporting harassment. This bias involves making decisions based on what is perceived as socially acceptable or approved by others rather than on one's own judgment or ethics.

5. **Fear of Social Repercussions**: The concern about how others perceive the person who reports harassment is a common fear but can be misleading in determining the right course of action. It can result in logical fallacies where fear of social consequences overshadows the importance of addressing unethical conduct.

These factors can discourage individuals from taking necessary actions against misconduct, suggesting the need for better support systems and cultural change within workplaces to ensure that such reports are handled appropriately and individuals feel safe to report without fear of social repercussions.