Question

...
Jason Mathias

Is there a censored fallacy?

"Social media are censoring conspiracy theories, therefore the conspiracy theories must be true."

People X are censoring people Y, therefore what people Y claim must be truth. 

asked on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:10:01 PM by Jason Mathias

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
4

The claim is essentially that social media companies don't want their users posting facts and things that are true. This is just ridiculous... and a non sequitur

The fact that something is censored, does not mean that it is true and the one censoring does not want the truth revealed. Although that is one reason for censoring (like a private company removing complaints in comments from their website), there are many more legitimate reasons. The reasons needs to be established with evidence, not simply asserted.

answered on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:18:52 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
1
Jason Mathias writes:

I found it, I guess there is an appeal to censorship fallacy. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Appeal_to_censorship 

posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 01:37:33 PM
...
0
account no longer exists writes:
[To Jason Mathias ]

Actually, that seems to be the opposite, when someone censors to make their statements appear true. According to the website you linked, the fallacy you mentioned would be the Galileo gambit: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Galileo_gambit

[ login to reply ] posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 05:08:14 PM
...
3
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:

Related to this, people often claim they're being censored when they aren't, to give validity to otherwise questionable claims!

posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 04:39:11 PM
...
1
Jason Mathias writes:
[To Rationalissimus of the Elenchus]

Exactly, I see a lot of click bait titles using this tactic. Is this related to the hypnotic bait and switch ?

[ login to reply ] posted on Saturday, Jan 01, 2022 05:01:56 PM