Is there a logical fallacy? Or fallacies?

I read the following (possibly fallacious) sentences in The Handmaid's Tale : 

"Men were not just going to go away, I said. You couldn't just ignore them.

That's like saying you should go out and catch syphilis merely because it exists, Moira said. 

Are you calling Luke a social disease? I said."

Yes, the exchange contains several logical fallacies and examples of poor reasoning:

1. **False Analogy**: Moira's response draws a comparison between men and syphilis, implying that engaging with men is equivalent to willingly contracting a disease. This analogy is flawed because the two scenarios are not comparable in terms of intent or consequence. The analogy falsely equates a social interaction (acknowledging the existence of men) with a health risk (contracting a disease), which is a misleading comparison.

2. **Strawman Fallacy**: Moira's argument can be seen as a strawman because it misrepresents the original statement. The initial point was about the necessity of acknowledging men's existence, not about seeking out harmful experiences. By likening the situation to contracting a disease, Moira does not address the actual claim, thereby setting up and attacking a weaker version of the argument.

3. **Loaded Question**: The question "Are you calling Luke a social disease?" introduces an assumption that the speaker is maligning Luke by equating him to a disease. This question is loaded because it imposes a negative interpretation and presupposes that the speaker made such a claim without evidence. It's a diversion that shifts the conversation from discussing men's societal roles to defending a particular individual.

These fallacies illustrate the use of faulty reasoning to sidestep the initial point about the necessity of engaging with men in society.