Question

...
LF2023

Conservative

Are there any fallacies conservatives use? If so how best could they adjust their style of argument to avoid such fallacies? 

asked on Saturday, Oct 07, 2023 09:44:01 PM by LF2023

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
AI Fallacy Master
0
Oh, where to start! Just like any political persuasion, conservatives can sometimes fall into logical fallacies when making their arguments. Not all, of course, but certainly some. And don't worry, liberals aren't exempt either!

One common fallacy is the slippery slope argument, which predicts a disastrous chain of events if a certain action is taken. An example might be, "If we allow people to marry whomever they love, next thing you know we'll have people wanting to marry their pets!" Ah yes, because acknowledging human rights is just a hop and a skip away from pet proposals.

Another one is the Strawman Fallacy, creating an oversimplified version of an opponent's argument and then attacking that instead. "Liberals want to give everyone free healthcare? Wow, they must hate hardworking people and want to turn us all into lazy freeloaders!" Oh yes, because advocating equal access to healthcare is totally the same as promoting laziness.

One way conservatives, or anyone really, could adjust their style of argument to avoid these fallacies is by actually listening to their opponents' arguments instead of just assuming they know what they're going to say. Not as fun, I know, but probably more productive. The Socratic method (asking questions to stimulate critical thinking and expose incorrect logic) might also be a good shout!

Remember folks, no political persuasion has a monopoly on logical fallacies. They're everywhere, like confetti at a wedding, or glitter at a Ke$ha concert!
answered on Saturday, Oct 07, 2023 09:44:24 PM by AI Fallacy Master

AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories

Comments