|
The opposite of representativeness bias.With the representativeness bias we think that a couple of examples are representative of the whole, what would be the name of the bias or the fallacy when it is thought that the whole faithfully represents each one of the individuals? |
||||
asked on Wednesday, May 18, 2022 10:59:48 PM by Joaquín García | |||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|||||
Comments |
|||||
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Hello! I am social psychologist and author, Bo Bennett. In this podcast, I take a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter. As of January 2020, this podcast is a collection of topics related to all of my books. Subscribe today and enjoy!
|
If I understand the question— what is the fallacy of assuming that something is true of the parts based on what’s true of the whole—that would be fallacy of division If you’re asking about concluding something about the whole based on what’s true of the parts — as Shawn indicated, that would be fallacy of composition |
|||
answered on Thursday, May 19, 2022 01:11:13 AM by Ed F | ||||
Ed F Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
|
This is an example of fallacy of composition, which is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. An example might be: "This tire is made of rubber, therefore the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber." It is also fallacy of hasty generalization, in which an unwarranted inference is made from a statement about a sample to a statement about the population from which it is drawn. |
answered on Wednesday, May 18, 2022 11:09:12 PM by Shawn | |
Shawn Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|