|
is there a fallacy here?P1: more and more teenagers are playing violent games P2: video games themselves have become more graphically and realistically violent P3: the number and variety of video games have expanded dramatically C: school violence is mainly caused by teenagers playing violent video games |
|||
asked on Thursday, Sep 30, 2021 09:56:45 AM by Shawn | ||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Totally invalid conclusion. |
answered on Thursday, Sep 30, 2021 05:56:08 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Yep! As Shawn says, this claim confuses correlation (things happening at the same time) with causation. It's a common point of confusion, but things happening together doesn't mean they cause each other. It seems like the questionable cause fallacy. I've also heard it referred to as cum hoc ergo propter hoc ... for the latin scholars among us. Depending on how this approach is used, it can lead to lying with statistics if one presents a high correlation as evidence of causation. |
answered on Friday, Oct 01, 2021 12:42:47 PM by Arlo | |
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|