|
Fallacy?1. Elephants are awesome. 2. Micheal is awesome. 3. Therefore, Micheal is an elephant |
|||
asked on Thursday, Aug 26, 2021 11:25:41 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
This logic seems to be "if elephant, then awesome. Awesome, therefore elephant." That is affirming the consequent However, please see Dr Bo's comments with regards to your contributions to the forum. |
answered on Friday, Aug 27, 2021 08:15:29 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|