|
Is this making a presumptionFrom [here]( www.newsweek.com/right-wi. . .
This makes an assumption on how to define what is male or female. Likewise he is making a definition as a strawman. |
asked on Monday, Feb 27, 2023 05:22:41 PM by 87blue | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The problem is, he is making a claim "because human beings exist in a sex binary" and stating it as a fact, when this is precisely what is up for debate. His argument does presuppose that his position is already correct. Even if he were right and this were an irrefutable fact, the presupposition still makes this a bad argument, persuasion-wise. |
|||
answered on Monday, Feb 27, 2023 05:28:32 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|