I have nothing to

"I have nothing to do debate you with, despite my refutation of my statement being a fallacy"

The statement "I have nothing to do debate you with, despite my refutation of my statement being a fallacy" contains several logical issues. Let's dissect these:

1. **Ambiguity**: The statement is somewhat vague and confusing, making it hard to understand the exact claim or argument being made. The phrase "I have nothing to do debate you with" seems to indicate that the speaker lacks resources or information to participate in a debate, but this is not clearly expressed.

2. **Self-Refutation**: The statement mentions refuting a statement and then calls that refutation a fallacy. It's important to clarify the claim and its refutation separately:
- If the original statement is true, then by stating that refutation is a fallacy, it contradicts itself.
- If the original statement is false, confirming that the refutation is a fallacy doesn’t add logical coherence.

3. **Syntax Issues**: The construction "I have nothing to do debate you with" is syntactically incorrect and makes the statement harder to analyze logically.

Here's a clearer and more logically sound version:

"I can't participate in the debate because I lack the necessary information and resources. Although my previous refutation was incorrect, calling it a fallacy does not change the fact that I am unprepared."

In summary, the original statement contains logical confusion and an unclear structure, both of which undermine effective communication and logical analysis.