Confusing an Explanation with an Excuse
Description: Treating an explanation of a fact as if it were a justification of the fact, a valid reason for the fact, or evidence for the fact.
Logical Form:
Person 1 wants claim X be justified.
Person 2 explains claim X in detail.
Therefore, claim X is justified / true.
Example #1:
Barto: If masks don’t work, how do you explain the almost perfect correlation between mask-wearing communities and lower transmission rates?
Tikki: All this means is that in communities where more people where masks, the virus is less-likely to spread. It is not proof that masks are the reason.
Marshall: Well, a "missing link" is the intermediary species between the two in the evolutionary process.
Explanation: Marshall simply explained what a missing link is; he did not give a valid reason for why he believes that Bigfoot is the missing link.
Exception: If it is clear to both parties that no justification attempt is being made, but rather just stating a fact, then this fallacy is not being committed.
Tip: If you are unsure if someone is trying to make an excuse or simply stating a fact, ask them. Don’t assume.
References: This a logical fallacy frequently used on the Internet. No academic sources could be found.
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course